University of Michigan’s Pay Practices Spark Legal Battle -Faculty Sue Over Pay Delays

University faculty allege systemic underpayment due to delayed implementation of salary increases.

University of Michigan Faculty File Lawsuit Alleging Pay Underpayment

Faculty members of the University of Michigan have initiated a class-action lawsuit against the university’s Board of Regents, alleging long-term underpayment due to delayed salary adjustments. The complaint, led by sociology professor Dr. Fatma Müge Göçek, claims that faculty appointed on a University Year basis were not compensated for raises during the first two months of the fiscal year.

The lawsuit, filed in Michigan’s Court of Claims, seeks monetary, declaratory, and injunctive relief, arguing that the university breached contractual agreements and was unjustly enriched at faculty members’ expense.

Allegations Highlight Disparities in Faculty Compensation

The suit contends that while faculty salaries are spread over a 12-month period starting July 1, salary increases are not applied until September 1. This delay systematically denies faculty the benefits of pay raises for two months each fiscal year. The discrepancy allegedly affects faculty across the university’s Ann Arbor, Dearborn, and Flint campuses.

For instance, Dr. Göçek, who has been with the university since 1988, experienced this delay during multiple years, resulting in underpayment totaling $3,643.67 between 2018 and 2024. The issue persisted despite clear policies in the university’s Faculty Handbook requiring salary increases to take effect at the beginning of the fiscal year.

University Responds With Policy Change but No Retroactive Pay

In 2024, the university announced plans to address the issue, stating that salary increases will align with the fiscal year starting in July 2025. However, the university has refused to compensate faculty for prior underpayments, prompting faculty members to seek legal recourse.

The lawsuit accuses the university of breaching its contracts, citing explicit policies mandating fiscal-year implementation of raises. Faculty members also allege unjust enrichment, asserting that the university used the withheld funds for operational expenses.

Broader Implications for Higher Education Compensation

The case underscores ongoing tensions in academia over equitable compensation and transparency. Faculty compensation has been a flashpoint in labor disputes nationwide, particularly as universities navigate budget constraints and shifting financial priorities.

The University of Michigan’s refusal to provide retroactive pay has drawn criticism, with plaintiffs arguing that the institution’s response fails to address the harm caused to faculty who relied on timely salary increases.

Relief Sought by the Plaintiffs

The lawsuit demands:

  • Certification of the case as a class action.
  • Financial compensation exceeding $25,000 for affected faculty members.
  • Injunctive relief to ensure compliance with fiscal-year policies.
  • Reimbursement of attorney fees and associated legal costs.

Related Context and Developments

This case emerges as universities nationwide face scrutiny over pay practices, with some faculty unions pushing for greater oversight and enforcement of contractual obligations.

The University of Michigan, a premier public research institution, has yet to issue a public statement regarding the lawsuit. Observers say the outcome could set a precedent for how academic institutions address pay-related grievances.

Find More Interesting Feature Stories From ThumbWind

  • Michigan Features
    Unveiling the people, places, and events that make the Great Lake State unique, we’ll explore hidden gems and must-do activities.
  • Weird Political News
    A sarcastic and insightful take on official news released by government sources, Political Action Committees, and Public Officials from all over the US. All stories are true and sourced.
  • Michigan News
    News and events of Michigan’s Upper Thumb that are worth knowing in the region.

Your Turn – Like This, or Hate it – We Want To Hear From You

Please offer an insightful and thoughtful comment. Idiotic, profane, or threatening comments are removed. Consider sharing this story. Follow us to have other feature stories fill up your Newsbreak feed from ThumbWind Publications.

Paul Austin

Paul is a writer living in the Great Lakes Region. He dabbles in research of historical events, places, and people on his website at Michigan4You.When he isn't under a deadline, you can find him on the beach with a good book and a cold beer.

View all posts by Paul Austin →